YES, to the test….

Urine Tests Miss Sexually Transmitted Infections

I HAVE A JOB.

I WORK, THEY PAY ME.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test (with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don’t have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn’t one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them?

PLEASE UNDERSTAND, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH HELPING PEOPLE GET BACK on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone SITTING ON THEIR BUTT —-DOING DRUGS WHILE I WORK.

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program “URINE OR YOU’RE OUT.”

JUST A THOUGHT, ALL POLITICIANS SHOULD HAVE TO PASS A URINE TEST.

3 thoughts on “YES, to the test….

  1. I have always felt the same way if I have to get my butt out of bed drive 50 miles to a decent job be subject to a drug test at random to make money for some sorry ass on welfare that is more physically able to work than me and takes my hard earned money and buys drugs with it while not taking care of their family it sucks

  2. Back when I worked for a living. I worked at a government secret facility, we had random screenings for drugs all of the time. If you had one come back positive you were placed on leave and retested two days later if that came back positive you were sent out the door for good. They understood that some times tests would show a false positive so the retest. If I had to test for drugs to work then everyone who gets welfare and welfare assistance should have to be tested to receive their checks. If they test positive twice then no more welfare ever. Cut them off permanently.

Leave a reply to Fred Cancel reply