ARE THE DEMOCRATS AFRAID OF PRESENTING THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT?
Sooner or later, Nancy Pelosi will have to name some impeachment managers and make the case for removing President Trump. So what’s the delay? There are probably a few reasons, but my guess is that the Democrats understand that their case is weak, as Professor Jonathan Turley wrote over the weekend: Securing an impeachment so fast does not earn you a historic prize. It simply earns you a historic failure. By not seeking to compel numerous key witnesses, the House now relies on the Senate to complete the case. Since the House has maintained that the record overwhelmingly proves that Trump is guilty, the Senate could simply try the case on the record supplied by the House. Indeed, in the 1999 impeachment of President Clinton, Senate Democrats, including Minority Leader Charles Schumer, fought against any witnesses and sought a summary vote without a trial.
Professor Turley is right. This is a very incomplete effort. My guess is that a real-world prosecutor would be fired for charging a defendant with such a weak case. Abuse of power – but what’s the actual crime? Obstruction of Congress – but that’s laughable under our separation of powers.
The Democrats created this mess by listening to their crazy left wing. They will now try to persuade the public that spending months on impeachment was better than sitting down with President Trump and talking health care or other more pressing matters.
Silvio Canto, Jr.
AN OPINION FROM THE DEPLORABLE INFIDEL
The reason the moron American hating Democrats are so pissed off is that Soleimani did not get a chance to spend all the $150 billion that Barack Obama and Joe Biden gave him before President Trump wiped him out. The Democratic leadership and the Democratic candidates running for president are the only people mourning Soleimani.
A SIMPLE TRUTH FOR TODAY
“The whole art of government consists in the art of being honest.”
When President Trump is through, maybe Old Abe can stand up straight!
After being married for 50 years, I took a careful look at my wife one day and said, “Fifty years ago we had a cheap house, a junk car, slept on a sofa bed and watched a 10-inch black and white TV, but I got to sleep with a hot 23-year-old girl every night.
Now, I have a $500,000 home, a $45,000 car, a nice big bed and a large screen TV, but I’m sleeping with a 69-year-old woman. It seems to me that you’re not holding up your side of things.”
My wife is a very reasonable woman. She told me to go out and find a hot 23-year-old girl and she would make sure that I would once again be living in a cheap house, driving a junk car, sleeping on a sofa bed and watching a 10-inch black and white TV.
Aren’t older women great? They really know how to solve an old guy’s problems.